Strategy behind delaying the case in the court

The more money the guilty spends the stronger the defender becomes.
The more money the petitioner spends the stronger the case becomes.

Narratives play a very important role while fighting a case.
Momentum can be gained by setting narratives.
Setting a narrative is like putting pressure. It can be on either petitioner or guilty.

There can be numerous reasons behind the delay of the case in the court:

The main reason is that there might be numerous other pending cases in the court where your case is being heard.
It can be due to the incompetence and inefficiency of judges.
Maybe due to the inadequate number of judges.
It can be due to some personal problems or health issues of the client’s legal advisor or judges or client.
Due to some lack of evidence in the case.
Due to political influence or pressure or money power or political mileage.
The case filed by the individual can be a fake one, or to just silence his or her opposition.

Tactics behind the delay of high profile cases in the court:

Whenever there is a high-profile case it gets delayed. The main reason is the more delay the easier it becomes for the offender to escape from the punishment. When there is a huge gap for the court trials then the culprit can get prepared well by hiring some good lawyer.
The offender can fly to other countries so that they can escape from the punishment.
The culprit can tell some created stories like a health issue or they might purposely get admitted to the hospital so that the hearing gets postponed.
The guilty can go underground.
The culprit can try to set some fake narratives in the public’s brain.
When the culprit is linked to the opposition or very close to the opposition party, the opposition party might create a problem for the ruling party by creating chaos so that the hearing gets postponed again and again and the case gets delayed and when the opposition party comes to the power then they can give clean chit to the culprit by bribing the judge.
When the offense created by the culprit is not so big then he or she might take the help of the politicians to get a clean chit.
The culprit may try to give death threats so that the individual who has documented the case will get fear and will take back the case.
The culprit may use some goons to kill the person who has documented the case against him or her. After killing they might create a fake story and spread it rapidly so that a false narrative is set.
The culprit might tell the petitioner to take back the case by bribing.
By bribing the guilty might tell the government or court to close the case.
Sometimes to create confusion among the public, or to scare, the culprit will document a counter case on the victim to set a false narrative.
Some high-profile cases will not be solved immediately because the ruling government wants political mileage. We human beings are leading a fast living life which makes us forget things quickly. So the ruling government wants to remind the public about the case by solving it when the elections are coming.

The trend has changed culprit is considered to be the victim and the individual who filed the case is considered to be the culprit. This is how the world is moving ahead. It’s always the genuine ones who face trouble. Welcome to the artificial world where money is everything.

Shoot your query here

Back

Forward

Reload

Print

Create QR Code for this page

Translate to English